WhatsappWow, this guy is good. In order to truly imitate, one needs to really understand the personality of the person being ridiculed. And of all of his impersonations, the Kamala impersonation really nails it. The more time passes, the more the reality of the Kamala Harris candidacy is being exposed as the candidacy of a person who clearly did not belong anywhere close to a Presidential ballot.
Kamala Harris grew up in an America where the President of the United States was known for laughing off nearly every attempt to ridicule or corner him in order to derail his policies and Presidency. Ronald Reagan was not only cheerful nearly all of the time. He was making jokes, even right after an assassination attempt, which it turns out was very close to killing him. Before entering emergency surgery, he joked with the surgeon, saying, “I hope you’re not a Democrat.” It is this kind of attitude on life that Kamala Harris was trying to mimic.
But there is a fundamental difference between Kamala Harris and Ronald Reagan. Reagan had deep-seated beliefs that were steeped in his understanding and education of the world’s challenges. He saw the United States as responsible for insuring a safe world and passing down the torch of freedom and prosperity to the next generation. It may seem obvious today, but he was one of the only leaders who spoke out openly about winning the Cold War, and not just keeping things at a stalemate.
Kamala Harris’ understanding of the world is clearly not one that is based on a solid education or much knowledge. That is why she produces so many word salads when dealing with any serious issue. She possesses none of the attributes that Ronald Reagan possessed. So she ended up coming off as artificially cheerful and ditsy.
That is why she has become the perfect person to ridicule. Kamala Harris is not done with American politics. She may very well try to become a Governor or Senator. Running for the Presidency and serving as a Vice President does indeed prepare a person well for a life of governance. But she should always be treated as the candidate that she has always been – a progressive liberal who is not merely soft on crime, but actually encourages crime. She is not supportive of Israel as much as she is supportive of pressuring Israel. She is indeed a laughable candidate.
